By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Azzanation said:
Aeolus451 said:
Azzanation said:
Crowd funding games is just wrong, not when there's a giant corporation that can easily afford to make the games for its user base. I don't work for Sony and I am not a sponsor, my hard earn cash isn't so I can help a corp think about investing and making games.

The idea on why we chose there platforms is because we trust them to supply us the games, not have the community make them instead.

Honestly would you pay Microsoft or Nintendo to help make there games? Even though they sit on billions of dollars.. No I wouldn't. Understandable if its those tiny indies developers like the ones who make 5 Nights At Freddie's or One Finger Death Punch as examples.

Its a good idea when there not sure about a game but those in this thread that support this idea only because they want to help the company then go buy shares or donate, don't force these silly ideas onto the gaming community.


Did you read the OP? It has nothing to do with games.

You dont understand, this is obviously a tactic to see if it works, it can implement into gaming not far from now. This could possibly be the way games could be made soon, where big companies dont have to spend a dime anymore for our entertainment.


Hmm. I don't think that they will implement something like that with games. Sony is also a tech company that makes all sorts of things. That's where they're having issues with losing money and trying to find a good product. This allows them to sort out public interest on risky products with less risk.

Many people are jumping to conclusions that this will play out in the worst possible way for consumers when there's nothing to support that line of thought with how sony runs itself as a company. 

Sony mainly misreads people's interest in a product and how much they're willing to pay for it.