uran10 said:
I think you purposely ignored the 2nd half of my post ot try to prove your point which by the wave will never work on me cause I don't ever trust a thing or believe a thing you say because of how hard you push your agenda. If it supports your agenda "its true" if it doesn't "Its false". Their credibility isn't good. |
Their credibility isn't good because you say so? So if you haven't heard of Time Magazine, their sources must be fake too?
I would call bullshit on this even if does support my "agenda" if it was something like "Nintendo Fan Hut" reporting it. But Digitimes is legitimate. They have been reporting tech supplier news like this for almost 20 years.