By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JRPGfan said:
This actually makes sense for alot of things microsoft does.

Surface lines (carizzo-l), their phones(custom arm designs), Hololense (HSAIL),...

Make money on each xbox chip sold, along with playstation chip, nintendo one.


Imagine if "microsoft" bought and owned AMD.... next thing you know..... DX13 "only" on AMD (goodbye nvidia).
Or special windows funktions buildt into hardware on the CPU, makeing intel suddenly not look as great a option.

Suddenly everything windows related would run fantastic on AMD, and for some reason... no one knows... everything not AMD would be horribly optimised and have random crashes ect :p

The law prevents them trying it. would be a worst case than Netscape.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."