So I just saw Jurassic World! [Spoilers]

[FentonCrackshell]

contestgamer said:

FloatingWaffles said:

1 - Yeah, but that was Hoskins idea. Plus it obviously ends up not being a good idea because they turn and kill almost everyone there aside from Owen and the other main characters. Hoskins is the one in the entire movie who thinks that using them is a good idea, even though it's not, and once he takes control he uses the park getting destroyed to his own personal benefit to try and test them. 

4 - The Indominus was part raptor so it made sense that it could communicate with the other raptors. 

6 - I feel like this was mainly just to show the character Claire that these animals weren't just science experiments like people on the island keep acting like they are. This is the first time where she actually sees one up close and personal so it shows her that they are actually animals and changes her view on them.

7 - Letting the T-Rex out was more of a last resort sort of thing. I mean think about it. At that point how many military personal were even on the island anymore? Hoskins took control of them and ordered them to take the research and leave. In fact most of the people working on the island left, aside from the one guy who decided to stay behind in the control room and opened the T-Rex door for Claire. The civilians were still hiding in the one place on the island as well. The raptors weren't going to be able to take down the Indominus by themselves so it made sense in a sort of "fight fire with fire" way that releasing the T-Rex would make it fight the Indominus. There were no other options at that point to take anyway. How else were they going to defeat it?

1. It's a completely unrealistic character - yeah it's his idea, but it's a useless plot device that destroys any sense of realism and ads nothing. No one head of private security there would actually make this type of assessment after seeing a guy make raptors stand in one spot from a suspended walkway.

4. Animals don't communicate that way - they were communicating as if speaking words, with the Raptors looking back and forth as if they were making rational assessments about what was being said. That's not how it works. The entire premise is also ridiculious given that the rex at that point could have easily called all the Raptors and humans as well which would have been a much more realistic response given the threat. Anthromorphizing these animals in this manner breaks all realism.

6. I know why it's there, but it's completely unrealistic. It was added in an absolutely ham fisted, horribly placed manner. The woman wouldn't give a damn about that dinosaur when she already barely gives a dam about humans - let alone when her two newphews are probably dead or dying in the field. Would you stop and shed tears while petting a dead Zebra if your cousins were lost in a Safari with lions that were going around maiming people? I doubt it.

7. Hoskins is private security - actual military would show up (Costa Rican plus international) within hours. When a serial killer is on the lose the solution isn't to release another one from prison to hunt it down. It's ridiculous and frankly suicidal logic.

Again, why are we looking for realism in this film? It's like when Matrix: Reloaded released many years ago an I read one film critic say that you should only go to see it if you want good action and awesome special effects. Well I didn't go see it because I want to see The Matrix for the great Keanu Reeves acting, the Oscars-level storytelling, and the tearjerker love story. Right?