U.S. Supreme Court Votes Gay Marriage Constitutional and Legal

[Runa216]

reggin_bolas said:

I will reiterate my protest and I will maintain this posture until my last breath. There is nothing inherently discriminatory or prejudiced about NOT supporting gay marriage.

A neutral state has absolutely no interest in issuing marriage licenses for same-sex couples. It's only legitimate interest is maintaining the same for straight couples capable of reproducing. Marriage is an institution for the protection and establishment of the natural family as we know it conceptually from biology. Ersatz methods of procreation does not obviate this simple truth.

The Supreme Court enforced a popularity contest. What occured can be considered a judicial farce.

 

Your ignorance amuses me.  

While you are technnically right, there is no prejudice in simply not supporting something, it doesn't change the fact that refusing to do so makes you part of the problem.  You don't have to like it, but you can't deny it really should be a basic right to marry whom you want.  and no, there's no proper logic that states "Oh, will now gays, what's next, dogs or kids?" because that is a logical fallacy, as there are clear expectations and rules on it, same as there has been for decades with straight marriage.  IT's not like loving someone who happens to have the same genitals as you suddenly means we can marry our pets or inanimate objects.  

Faulty logic is faulty.

And as for the whole "Reproduce" and "Natural order" bullshit, well, look at our population.  we could use fewer people breeding, and almost nothing we do is 'natural' anymore, almost by definition.  So yeah, by refusing to support love, you are an affront to progess, part of the problem, and exactly what most forward thinking, progressive, modern, freedom loving people have every reason to despise. 

Get with the times.  Stop living in the past, and drop your attraction to some old timey wimey values that actually aren't even that traditional.  until recently, (like, in the grand scale of things, the last century and a half), it was customary to marrry off daughters as soon as they hit puberty.  You know, to strengthen relations with one's neighbour.  

And always remember:  If you like your damn tradition so goddamn much, then KEEP ENJOYING IT! this isn't going to put an end to traditional straight marriage, it's not like gays marrying makes your marriage preferences any less valid.  It's progress.  it's better, it's not taking anything away from what you have.  and if you think it is, you are flatly wrong, and as I reiterate, your ignorance amuses me to think that there are still people so backwards about this.