A_C_E said:
I pointed out the delusion in your words, what else is it called when you claim something but there's huge amounts of evidence against it? That's literally the description of delusion, I was factually pointing it out that your WORDS were delusional, not specific to you as a person. I never said you were delusional, read it again. I also pointed out your narrow-mindedness and that's also different than calling you narrow-minded. If I had called you a narrow-minded individual then yeah, I would have insulted you, instead I pointed out your narrow-mindedness on the subject. Context, learn it. But why am I even explaining this to such a seemingly assuming person like yourself? I'm not out to insult you and I have yet to do it but if you want to see things that aren't there just to be dramatic then...whatever butters your toast. Oh, and nice diversion from the discussion, or was that the plan all along? |
I can sit here all day saying or writing that someone else's words are moronic, immature, insane, bitchy, ect but it doesn't change the fact that I would be insulting them. Here's another example, If I said that someone else's words were idiotic than what am I implying about the person who said the words.
By saying that my words were delusional, it doesn't dismiss my point or my opinion. You didn't actually go after my points.
My intention was simply to let ya know that I didn't care for your personal attacks or implications. I'm completely fine with discussing with others the topic but not with you.
This is my last reply to you.
