By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fireburn95 on 24 June 2015
Edit Thread
ihatefatkatz said:
Normchacho said:

I say nitpicking because he mentions quite a few things in that post and you keep holding up that one example as proof that he has no idea what he's talking about when as I said, is still something the head of NoA would have at least a hand in dealing with.

What business dealing? What has Nintendo done well on it's business side as of late?

I'm not saying that agree in saying he should resign, I'm saying the points you are so eager to dismiss are certainly valid and reflect poorly on his job performance.

Also, why do you always jump right to claims of bias? I'll back up any and everything I say.

What other point did he make to justify Reggies sacking? All I got is that he doesn't like Reggie shit talking the competion, poor marketing, blames for the lack of games, blames for the lack of north american developers and blames for the lack of third party parties. The bold are global issues affecting Nintendo in every region; this should hint that this has very little things to do with Nintendo of America and more of the parent company (it can be said there is alsoa  lack of european developers as well) .

Blaming and asking for the resignation of reggie because of these reasons is beyond ridiculous and shows a poor understanding on how things work. 


Again you nitpick one point when you probably didn't even read entirety of OP, 

Reggie is damaging Nintendos reputation with development community. You haven't addressed that. 

Also he is plain out lying/deceiving which can also affect Nintendos reputation with the fans, which if you click the links on OP, it effing has already.

According to you, Reggie is incapable of fighting for more control in the business. You keep saying I don't understand Nintendos business structure, but does the fact Japan has so much power justify Reggie's lack of responsibility?

Reggie's name is on the signature of NoA, if he has no major control, and he is unable to gain more decision making power, why is he still there? If NoJ drive NoA into the ground, Reggie will get the blame because in any other business, the president or coo of the company does get the blame, there's no exceptions in the real world of business