By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ihatefatkatz said:
fireburn95 said:

Well I don't know what agenda is here to sell but here this:

 

If Nintendo Japan had control over everything to the point where Reggie's duties are minor - let's say Nintendo japan made a bad decision that essentially broke Nintendo America, now Reggie is the president of NoA and therefore the wider apparent responsibility will fall on him.

If you're the president of an organisation within a company but have little to no control, do you really want to be that president and ultimately get the blame for when something goes wrong? 

It doesn't matter what the business structure of Nintendo is, or how Nintendo operate, Reggie's signature is on everything that comes out of NoA, and he will therefore get the blame while he is still there.

You - on your own accord - are blaming Reggie without a sound undestanding of how things work at Nintendo.  Sure you can get angry about what he says in an interview and the poor marketing, that's on him.

But the other things you are pitting the blame on him is on the parent company and not reggie. It's not hard to understand


Well to me it seemed I quoted four points which were words that came out of Reggie's mouth, one where he insulted Nintendo fans (Iwata didn't apologise) one where he insulted developers (your VR content isn't fun even though I didn't play it recently) insulted competition needlessly (they have content but no exclusives) and falsely shared info (we don't announce games 5/6 years in advance like others)

 

The only other thing I've mentioned is Nintendos ad policy which sorry, I think Reggie should have a fucking say in.

 

Added into Nintendos dwindling reputation due to sales etc. Which I never blamed reggie for, it doesn't spell a good sentence for the leadership at Nintendo, one of whom is Reggie who is the focus of this thread.