Legend of Zelda vs Final Fantasy, wich is the better franchise?

[Runa216]

Anfebious said:

I didn't say it works if you stop to calibrate it. It's an option you have in case it's not calibrated. You can also press the down button on the D-Pad to center the gyroscope. Controls worked fine in my 50 hour playthrough, I only had to calibrate at the start of each session (which is mandatory every time you start up the game).

I find it as a minor offense. It's not like Final Fantasy has no dumb characters (in fact, it's full of them).

Skyward Sword wasn't perfect but it isn't the terrible game you are making it out to be.

Well then I just got a shitty version of the game because my WiiMotion Plus had to be recalibrated every ten minutes, both an actual proper controller and one with the dongle add-on.  And even when it was working, it was cumbersome, inconsistent, unreliable, and not fun at all.  I, like most people, sit on a couch or chair when gaming, and that game required you be standing.  I only stand when playing Rock Band/Guitar Hero. 

And yes, Final Fantasy had dumb characters, but Final Fantasy also had amazingly deep and well developed characters.  Even the shitty ones everyone hates (Tidus, Squall, Wakka) had phenomenal character arcs that showed them slowly growing into something special.  The writing was better, the characters had better stories, and while there's no denying there were shitty characters, the ratio in Final Fantasy of Good:Bad characters is far better than Zelda.  In Zelda, it's usually Link/Zelda and a handful of others vs ALL THE OTHER CHARACTERS IN THE GAME.  I can't stand going to Kakariko in Ocarina of time, because everyone there's an unlikeable idiot.  I can't listen to that game thanks to NAvi.  Fi was quite possibly the worst character in any video game I've ever played, bar none.