By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Volterra_90 on 21 June 2015
Edit Thread
AEGRO said:
Volterra_90 said:
I think this is absurd. It's obvious that photorealistic games tend to look the same, because they are aiming to the same thing, photorealism. And, on the other way, cartoonish games can aim to a wide range of art styles. I'm not criticizing realistic games, it's just that, obviously, they tend to look the same because of what they are trying to achieve. I think that this is so obvious it hurts XDD.


Exactly. Photorealism is "the " art style for the game. The difference between one from another is (spoiler alert) the story.

 

Miyamoto must be confused from all the "save the princess" games that Nintendo have.

Yeah, he's talking about how the games look, not about the stories. And there's a lot of games which are trying to achieve (or getting close) to photorealism, so, that's it xDDDD. 

EDIT: I'm not saying that all the realistic games look the same, but, there are some of them which try to achieve that photorrealism that are, obviously, very similar. There are realistic games with diverse art styles, but, tons of games are trying to achieve that photorrealism, and I think that's what Miyamoto is trying to say. Battlefield, CoD, Assassin's Creed, For Honor, the shit ton of Tom Clancy's games, Farcry, lots of militar shooters....