GameMasterPC on 21 June 2015
| Angelus said: Sounds pretty simple to me. I don't see the problem? You say Fallout 4 looked the best to you, plus it's a given that game will be able to occupy your time the longest (not counting investment in Halo MP). So that's your buy #1. Then you say Tomb Raider looked good, but Halo didn't really impress you that much, so Tomb Raider clearly is your buy #2. You get a great RPG, and a great Action/Adventure game. The former will keep you busy long enough till you can afford to go get Halo later, if you still want to. |
Thanks but I don't think you can judge a game based on its E3 showcase alone. For all we know, only the best parts of Rise Of The Tomb Raider were shown at E3 but the not so good parts of Halo 5 were shown. My interest is similar for each based on previous games in these series. That's why I have this question.
I gave my views on E3 gameplay cause that might give you an insight but it doesn't tell the whole story obviously.
