By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
naruball said:
DonFerrari said:
Very funny isn't it?

Sony in some manner gets a timed or console exclusive they are clear... when Capcom is asked by SF5, SE about FF VII or YS about Shenmue 3 they were all clear on what is exclusive and to what.

And PS top manager when asked about one of the exclusives said how long it would stay exclusive to PS4, he didn't resort to "I won't comment about other platforms, that is the job of the IP owner, but them have the owner of the IP says they can't comment as well"... isn't it realy strange?


More like shady. But unfortunately, it works. The point is to make money even if you deceive the consumer. With these practises, gamers, especially the ones not following the news closely, don't know any better. I bet most of the xb friends that I have are sure that it's only coming to xb1. If it works, I don't see any reason MS would want to change their approach.

This is why even though a lot of people praise Phill Spencer as the good guy and gamers friend I still think he isn't on the same level of transparency as Shu.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."