the-pi-guy said:
Didn't set the world on fire, but lots of people loved the games. And I'm not sure what you mean by maybe 2017. It's planned for 2016. And they are confident about that release date. There are no games, that you can possibly be 100% certain will come out a certain time, unless you plan on shipping it regardless of how broken it is. A promise is kinda selling it short I think here too. Aren't all games promises? Like I said, you can't guarantee that a game will come out at any time. How do you know something bad won't happen and Halo will be delayed? Anything could happen in game development.
Some great stuff, absolutely. Does that mean that MS won? It does to lots of people, but it really depends on what their taste is. Backwards compatibility is an awesome feature, but how much does it really matter? We can't objectively say company X or company Y won based on these criteria. If someone didn't have an Xbox 360, BC might as well not exist. Those games depends on if those are the types of games people play. Gears of War remaster is a remaster. Tomb Raider, we knew was coming, Forza 6, by the way, we knew was coming, we get Forza every year in one way or another. Don't know enough about Hololens, heard some bad things, and we can't judge it based off the "artist's rendering." I've heard that the Field of View in the actual headset isn't very good. You mention that gamers are so easily manipulated. I disagree that's what it is at all. And essentially all your Sony points were "That's great, but...." "Shenmue 3, that's great, but it's a way away." We can do the same thing with Microsoft's stuff. "Backwards compatibility, that's fantastic, but I paid 350+$ to play new games, why would I want to play old ones." "A new controller, cool, but it's 150$" Frankly, I don't care about the three big games Sony announced. They weren't the most exciting games at the conference for me, by a long shot. In fact, I'm more interested in MS's ReCore than really any of those. So I think it's an incorrect notion to assume that "gamers were manipulated, and that's why Sony won." Some people genuinely are more interested in the games that were shown. |
I left off a lot. It was just a synopsis. Really, that Sony vr headset had me more excited than anything. And games like Cuphead, that Rare pirate game, that space game, Fable, etc all have varying levels of excitement. Maybe we can't agree on it M$ or Sony "won" E3. Can we at least agree that Nintendo lost?