By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Hiku said:
LuckyTrouble said:
Hiku said:
Sharu said:

Please, get some logic lessons, man. Reggie talks about next Nintendo home console. Is this home console related to NX and what is that NX (or QOL also) - we just don't know).

Yes we do, because the only public announcement Nintendo has made that he could be refering to, is the NX announcement.
Feel free to priovide a link to any other public announcement he could be refering to. Until then, you have nothing supporting your claim.

And if you have to rely on personal insults to get your point across, then you obviously don't have a very strong case here.
You can cut that out any time, btw.

See, the flaw in your logic is that you're making assumptions based on incomplete and vague information, using articles that aren't even proof, but rather more assumptions. In your mind though, this theory is so concrete that unless somebody can give hard evidence to refute your theoretical evidence, it won't be good enough.

You ignored the fact that announcing something publicly doesn't mean it would even be reported. I mean, what site would report "the next home console is in development"? As I previously stated, most gamers see that as common sense, and no journalist would see that as news worthy unless there was actually information about said new home console to report. You just want to be right so badly, you are latching onto anything that could possibly prove your point and bathing in a pool of logical fallacies for the sake of being right in something nobody is trying to be right in. It's theories. Theories. Nobody is stating their theory as fact except for you, which is why we keep responding to you stating how your "fact" is just another theory.

There's no flaw in that uless there's something pointing to the opposite, yes.
You've provided 0 counter-evidence, other than just saying "I doubt this, just because there could be a mistake."

And do you seriously think a company like Nintendo would publically announce a new console without it being reported?
And then Reggie would casually referr to it as their public announcement, as if we all already know about it quite well?

Fact is, Reggie said their next home console has been publically announced. The only public announcement Nintendo has made that he could be refering to, is the NX announcement.
And Tanabe said that a console Metroid would be moved to the NX, if it had begun development.

But all these things are missunderstandings, because ethey could be?
If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, it's a dog?

I'd perhaps buy that if you had any counter evidence whatsoever, but you've provided 0 counter-evidence so far.

You act like evidence is necessary to dismantle strung together assumptions. It's gone from "Metroid Prime 4 would probably be on Nintendo's next console, assumed to be the NX" to, Metroid Prime 4 is coming to the NX. It's gone from "we've mentioned the next home console was in development" to "omg nobody reported on that particular moment so it has to have been about the NX". I'm not going to go digging up counter evidence for a theory. Especially when there is literally no evidence for anything yet. What you call "evidence" feels more like a poorly made joke. I don't get how it's difficult to understand that I'm dismissing your evidence based on the lack of logic behind your basic ideas that this evidence is meant to support.

Anyways, I'm done with this, and by this I mean you. This is just going in circles anyways.