By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KoiIroRazu on 18 June 2015
Edit Thread
GameMasterPC said:
KoiIroRazu said:


My "fanboyism" isn't the reason for me not focusing on the graphics, it's more my overall mindset and expectations from a game. Nintendo has a reason for keeping the graphics low and I am ready to say, that they maybe could have chosen another way to get around it, but I am more happy to see, that they are focusing on framerate and gameplay, instead of the aesthetics.

This whole thing reminds me a bit of F-Zero X, which sacrified graphics for a constant 60 fps. It also looked like shit, but it is still (for me atleast) one of the most kickass racing games. I'm not saying that you are wrong about expecting more from a current gen game, because you a right in that regard, it's more that I am stunned that everything everyone talks about when talking about Star Fox Zero is the graphics.

I never called you fanboyish, I said fan, big difference. And yes, framerate and gameplay matters, but so does graphics. The Wii U can handle 60fps with much better graphics as shown by Bayonetta 2. And Star Foz Zero isn't anywhere near that level of graphics. This is an absoutely lazy attempt at making a Star Foz game and fans like you are the reason they think they can get away with it.

No one would have complained if it even looked decent cause we don't expect great graphics in Wii U games, but this worse than some 2007 PS3 games like Uncharted: Drake's Fortune and MotorStorm or 360 games like Halo 3. This shold nt be defended by anyone, this would only promote more lazy overpriced games from Nintendo. They still have time to improve the graphics so I'll wait but right now it doesn't look worth buying for me.


Woah, you make it sound as if I commited some sort of crime. First of all, Nintendo doesn't give a shit, they'll always think they can get away with anything, because they're always doing their own thing. Second of all, it's not like the graphical quality of this game is the premise of all Nintendo games having put "less effort" into the graphics, as Nintendo usually atleast makes graphically-polished games.

Before E3 I had the fear of Star Fox Zero being, yet again not a real successor to Star Fox 64, so I was pleasently suprised by what I got to see.

And also, I would defend any game that's getting shat on solely for it's graphics and everything else about the game being ignored. As I said, I don't completely disagree and I understand your sentiments to some extent, but I think that all of this complaining is a bit too much.