Is the Wii U the worst console of all time?(OP clarification)

[SanAndreasX]

bunchanumbers said:

ctk495 said:

I don't know how to troll but you sure know how to spam by making an irrelevant one line comment. Don't you think I haven't already read the previous commnets by other posters? Also what facts am I ignoring haven't I already clarified what I meant? The Wii U being worst in respect to the big 4 companies( Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft and Sega.) Yet you and the other posters seem to ignore what I said and keep on latching to the title of the thread.  

@SanAndreasX

You haven't answered the question I stated: Which console made by the big 4 companies( Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft or Sega) is worst than the Wii U? Instead you are using a red herring fallacy by keep on bringing the title when I have already clafiried that. Also it seems you haven't even taken the time to read my response. Aren't you doing anything you can to defend the Wii U? Aren't all those companies(Atari, Phillips) already out of bussiness? It seems I have proven my case. 

Because the title of the thread is the summarization of your entire post. You're also saying that the GCN is the worst console before it which makes no sense. You're conveniently forgetting the Virtual Boy, The 32X, the Sega CD, and the very first Nintendo console. Not to mention the Vita and the OG Xbox. Your title makes no sense when you're trying to compare it to the big 4. Which there is no 4. Sega died years ago as a manufacturer. Change your title.

The OP is also conveniently ignoring Atari, which had the first smash-hit home video game (Pong) and the first smash-hit home console with a library of interchangeable game media as well, just because they're out of the hardware business. Yet Sega counts somehow, despite the fact that they died as a console manufacturer a long time ago and are well on their way to dying completely as a console software manufacturer? Did Sega even have an E3 booth this year?

The goalposts just won't stop moving on this one.