Dark souls 3 announced at microsfts presser

[Dgc1808]

fireburn95 said:

Dgc1808 said:

The people that need a casual mode would not play online. These are the people that are just in it for the story and some liesure fun. The bolded is a non-issue. Do people that play CoD or Street Fighter campaigns on easy only play online? No... Of course not. They didn't buy the game for competition and challenge and what they do play has no effect on the people that are there for competition and challenge. When they do go online for shits and giggles, they get wrecked if they're not paired with another casual player. The same would simply be true for a racer and a souls game.

So give the casuals an easy mode, but essentially a limited version of the game? What if two casuals want to play together? What if a casual and his friend, a pro, want to play together? Suddenly they cant.

Part of the fun of souls is the difficulty. Take out the difficulty, you take out the fun.

You're essentially saying that the people that played The Last of Us on Easy played a different game than the people that played only ond Survivor/Grounded. Arguably true. I probably couldn't have fun on easy, but that doesn't mean other's can't. Both sets of TLOU players can get what they want out of the game. If someone has a problem with how the multiplayer works, they simply wouldn't buy it or play offline. I have no problem ignoring TLOU's online and playing offline in Bloodborne. (I win most of the time with DS PvP, I just don't care for it. Also don't like getting help.) 

If they want to play together, they play together. The pro wins either way game.... like I just explained.  This is literally a non-issue.

Fun is subjective.