By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MikeB said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
He refused to even acknowledge that was the case, and kept using FMVs as proof the PS3 could do 1080p, and not actual 3D graphics.

Care to explain what you're talking about? Please quote me instead of making things up.


Ah, the old deny an argument you made before. 

Try looking at the thread about Call fo Duty 4 in 600p. I'm not quoting because then I'd have to quote around a half dozen posts or more. I kept stating that texture resolution is where actual detail is in 3D graphics, which is whe the memory use went to instead of screen resolution, and you kept stating that FMVs were proof screen resolution was important.

If you knew anything about 3D graphics, you would know that FMVs are a series of bitmaps, and texture are bitmaps, therefore, they are to be compared in resolution, not screen resolution. The same with GTA IV. You got, well, assloads of high quality textures running at once. You cannot compare Gran Truismo, since that just loads a track, not the whole fucking world. You also cannot compare Super Stardust, since most of its graphics are effects.

In other words, you have to use SIMILAR games to prove the PS3 can do what you claim, not just ANY game.  



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs