Nintendo should partner up with Capcom to make a Nintendo vs. Capcom game.

[teigaga]

spemanig said:

teigaga said:

I rushed in to say no but theres actaully good mix of characters between capcom and Nintendo to balance each other out.

Does anyone want to play a Mario, Kirby, Yoshi in a serious 1vs1 brawler though? Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should.

I think a 3D action, powerstone type party experience will better suited to the overall roosters. It would be immediately distinguishable from smash and it could offer more gameplay experiences then what a 2D brawler could (isomentric co-op campaign with a story, mini games galore etc).

Save it for NX though :p

"Does anyone want to play a Mario, Kirby, Yoshi in a serious 1vs1 brawler fighing game though?"

...Is that a serious question?

Plenty of people do. Nintendo already has enough party games. We need a fighting game. On the Wii U. If you want a party game, play Smash. Or Mario Kart. Or Mario Party.

Of course. I've never until this point seen this be expressed. Just because Wii U may be lacking a proper fighting game it doesn't mean mario and rooster should fill the void. 

I'm all for Nintendo expanding and filling different niches but not by forcing characters in titles I don't think are befitting for them, I thinks thats probably the same reason why smash was never a serious fighting game. The same reason why everything Mario is in a casual package, whether its the sports, platforming, action or RPG in genre. Also how do you classify Smash Bros a Brawler? It seems to resemble a casual fighting game to me.

I would rather get a traditional capcom fighting game with maybe a few  befitting Nintendo characters in as bonuses (Soul Caliber on Gamecube). 

Also I think my isometric action game will sell more and has bigger potential for Nintendo :P