NJ5 said:
I'll tell you what's funny as you don't see it yet. What's funny is this (exaggerated for effect): Halo 3 at 640p on 360: "HAHA it's not even HD, the 360 sucks and can't produce true HD graphics! If it was on the PS3, it would run at 1080p, 120fps, make french toasts and cure cancer all at the same time" GTA IV allegedly at 630p on the PS3: "Who cares about resolution, it's not important anyway!" If you don't see the hypocrisy yet, I can't help you any further :P In the end, it's just another day in fanboydom, nothing unexpected here.
|
point is there are dozoens of NATIVE 1080p games on PS3 there are like 3 on xbox.... Halo 3 is microsofts BIGGEST GAME. if bungie could NOT do it on a game the size of halo then i can NOT be done.......
The issue here is not "can the ps3 do it" its "why didnt rockstar do it".... the issuse with halo is "it can NOT be done"
Thats is why it does not make a difference. A 3rd party game vs THE NUMBER ONE exculsive game on the planet........ if i had to put money down id think halo would be in 1080p not GTA4... a 3rd parties 1st next gen game on ps3 and its on 2 different systems vs and second party game on one system that had a budget of only god knows what.......
NJ5 you dont see the point so i had to spell it out for you...







