| SamuelRSmith said: I can't take this quiz (anymore), primarily because I feel like some of the questions are loaded with the quiz's viewpoint and if I answer honestly, would mean something different from the quizmakers' intentions. For example, the very first question: "If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations." I'm going out on a limb and saying that voting agree on this moves you left, while voting disagree will move you right. However, what if, like me, you believe that interests of trans-national corporations are the interests of humanity, with nuance (so long as it's done by free trade). I support global free trade, but I do not support the EU, NAFTA, TPA, or any of that lot. This question would assume that I do support those things. |
That seemed like a loaded question in my opinion. Some of the others seems like that too.
Why can't the interests of trans-national corporations primairly serve humanity or sustain people's quality of life?
It's making it seem like it's a "either or" situation when one is being worded to look bad to fix the outcome.
Kinda like...
Would you rather be rich and a morally bad person but lonely?
or
Would you rather be a good but poor person who is liked by most?








