By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Normchacho said:
taus90 said:
Normchacho said:
DirtyP2002 said:
I think out of the three major vr products, oculus rift has the best chances to succeed. First it is backed by Microsoft in combination with Facebook. This is basically unmatched. And it will get easy support from Windows 10.

Valve is new to the hardware business (HTC is not), they will have a hard time to sell those steam machines and I just don't get why they are skipping such a crucial E3 for them. Sure Steam is big, but I bet PC games will support Oculus as well.

Morpheus... Well that is Sony doing their own thing, without a major partner and no relation to PC gaming. Somehow this sounds more like HD-DVD than the other products.


I agree though HoloLens will be a new level.


That's weird, I think Oculus may find themselves having the most trouble.

Valve as of right now pretty much owns the PC gaming space and have a good reputation amongst PC gamers. On top of that, their headset is likely going to be the first to market and will pack the best hardware. It will be more expensive, but for the people that are willing to throw down the kind of money for a PC that will even run a VR headset, and the early adopters that are going to be so important to VRs sucess, that better hardware and early launch are going to be important.

Sony is the only one without a major partner because they're the only one who doesn't need one. Sony does hardware and software all by themselves.  The Morpheus will most likely be the cheapest of the three headsets and will require the smallest investment to be able to use, which means that it will be the most mass market friendly. Being on console also means that it will have no direct competitor.

The Rift though, could end up in a tight spot. It's going to launch after the Vive and won't be as good of hardware. It will be cheaper but likely still far from cheap with the CEO quoted as saying that the headset and PC to run it together should cost around $1500. They also don't have the established fanbase or storefront from which to market their headset or it's games.

Edit: I forgot to mention that Oculus is owned by Facebook now. Which has not been a very popular change amongst the very people they need to buy it when it launches next year.

 + 1

also I would believe Microsoft and oculus partnership will do more harm to VR than benefit anyone of them. I just hope casual adopter of VR, doesn't get the impression, that VR is all about sitting in a virtual room and play game on a screen front.. and that morpheus and HTC vive will be the same.

Also I agree with the OP, the way MS implemented HD DVD to 360, just to play movies and not games. xbox1 VR implementation is in the same league as HD DVD was. tacked on.

 


I actually don't think the MS partnership will hurt VR as a whole. I think other headsets (particularly the Morpheus) will get enough attention to make sure people know what VR is about.

I don't think OR is really that much like HD DVD. HD DVD was beaten out by a better tech that had more backers, OR just might get stuck between a cheaper, more market friendly device, and a more impressive, hardcore focused device.

I m not saying what led to its doom. I m just saying MS has similar apporoach with vr as they had with HD DVD.. half baked implementation.