noname2200 said:
The complete bases for your assertion are that: 1) they're slumping* in the finals, and 2) the infallible Charles Barkley picked the Cavs to win it in six games.
This is the logic of a sports talk radio caller. I think I speak for everyone here when I say that it's not that no one can rebut your claim, it's that it's not worth rebutting in the first place.
*As in, have two narrow losses in four games. |
I get that this thread is full of a bunch of Golden State homers that can't handle the truth that their team is highly overrated if you compare them unbiased against any other team that won the title in the last 40 years they are not as good. Also the final score doesn't tell the whole story of both of those games the Cavs where pretty much in control through both of those games. Plus on top of that you are forgetting that they had a narrow win in the first game they could have easily lost that one also.








