By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chris Hu on 12 June 2015
Edit Thread
PAOerfulone said:

LeBron's 2007 Cavs team also got swept by a Spurs team that had already won 3 championships before hand with Tim Duncan, Tony Parker, and Manu Ginobli.
Coincidence that the more experienced team defeated the team that had never been there before? I think not.
Also, it's 67 wins, NOT 66.
You think winning 67 games down the stretch of a long 82 game season while playing primarily in the Western Conference where most of the REAL competition is, is overrated?!
It's a good thing that the those NBA analysts on ESPN, ABC, and TNT are the analysts and not you.


The fact remains they are extremely overrated no matter how you look at it.  If they win it all they will easily be the most overrated team to win a final in the last 40 years.  Plus the 2007 Spurs team wasn't the same team that won the previous three titles since none of the Spurs teams won back to back titles they are all pretty different.  Its not like the 1990-93 Bulls and the 1995-98 those two squads pretty much had the same roster for the first three titles then they retooled a bit and had pretty much had the same roster for the next three titles.  Also speaking of analysts Charles Barkley picked the Cavs to win the series in six I highly doubt he wouldn't pick the Cavs if he doesn't agree with me that the Warriors are highly overrated.