By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
DonFerrari said:

And does it need answering the people bringing it all the time? Or endless discussion about minute things to prove or disprove that WiiU have consistently sold better or worse than a dead console?

If I see a false statement being made, I'm going to correct it, that's all.


And keep bickering forever on a pointless argument?? WiiU even selling slower than DC have more healthy sales and is (at least for nintendo) a viable and profitable platform, something DC didn't manage.... so you could just ignore the guy... because you were just discussing the interpretation of "almost double the time''... will it make a difference in the end if someone defines WiiU taking "double the time" to outsell DC? There are people that it isn't worth using your time to convince.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."