Soundwave said:
Even if the 3DS was $100 right now ... why should I as a cheap parent even bother when my kid is just as happy with the hand-me-down tablet I've given him/her with free/$1 games versus $30 games and having to pay another $100 on top of that? A low cost, rinky-dink handheld in the modern market is just going to look like a cheap piece of sh*t too in the modern market next to even a cheapo tablet that has a nice big screen HD display. Even with kids you'll get called out for releasing a cheap product. The sad irony is the first portable HD Nintendo games are going to be on the iPhone and Android, not on a Nintendo handheld. The "lets release something with 10 year old hardware and an absolute turd of a screen" thing worked in the GBA era ... but Nintendo has no competetion back then and consumers had no frame of reference for anything better so they just accepted it. I mean the original GBA is such a piece of shit honestly I can't believe now Nintendo ever got away with it. You couldn't play the thing in anything other than direct sunlight and games like Castlevania were so dark that you could barely see the game (lol) because Nintendo cheaped out on the screen at the last minute (so the developer didn't have time to re-adjust the graphics). |
I say you're wrong on the original GBA. It wasn't a cheap move. Put your mindset back to 2001. Having any form of backlighting LCD was an amazing feature then. I was amazed when the SP came out. Not only over the backlight. But the rechargable battery pack. Than the Pokemon Wireless adapter brought it to new levels. These where all brand new functions that are totally old hat and expected now. Not then. The original ipod was black and white. And cost a lot more than a GBA SP.







