| Finanzminister said: Splatoon maybe cost 60$, but look how much Battlefield Hardline costs or what they want for BF4 (which was broken as fuck) to get the "Premium" aka Standard Edition. I would rather pay 100 for Splatoon in the current form before EA get 79+ Bucks from me for their uninspired and broken garbage, Content is important but the gameplay is the real deal. Go play Counter Strike for comparison there are thousands of Maps and how many do they play, 3? 4? And I mean literally since decades!! So I am ok with paying 60$ for Splatoon. |
Paying and supporting less content game for $60 is like asking developers to focus on only mutliplayer with fun maps instead of giving more cotent thats worth of that price and also skip single player totally in future which is bad for industry. Splatoon is a cash grab try by Nintendo by pricing at $60 and locking some content behind Amiboo so they are extracating more money out of a small budget/Indie level efforts game compared to AAA level game budgets and efforts needd by other game developers. Splatoon is good fun game but the pricce and content they offer is not worth. Just because the game is fun does not mean we have to pay $60 for a 30-40$ efforts game and its ok if any is fine with ths but they should remember that they are supporting a bad practice here which might hurt all gamers in future.
GAMING is not about spending hours to pass/waste our time just for fun,
its a Feeling/Experience about a VIRTUAL WORLD we can never be in real, and realizing some of our dreams (also creating new ones).
So, Feel Emotions, Experience Adventure/Action, Challenge Game, Solve puzzles and Have fun.
PlayStation is about all-round "New experiences" using new IP's to provide great diversity for everyone.
Xbox is always about Online and Shooting.
Nintendo is always about Fun games and milking IP's.







