How Many First Party Remasters Has Sony Actually Done?

[JWeinCom]

A_C_E said:

JWeinCom said:

It isn't a matter of law.  I never claimed that Sony broke any law. It's a matter of making decisions that are the best for their consumers.  They had two choices.  One was better for their consumers, and one was better for them.  They chose the one that was best for them.  Nothing illegal about it, but personally, if I had bought the original, I'd have been miffed about it.

Fair enough, but I know for me I was thrilled when I heard Sony had just announced TLoU Remastered. Some people like remasters, some people couldn't be bothered to spend their money to play something they already played just to get better performance and I respect your opinion.

Like I said earlier, it's less about the actual remasters, and more about the lack of original content.  The two things may be related or not, but they are connected in the mind of many gamers.  It's like if you go to a restaurant, and you order your main course, and you're waiting for your meal, and the waiter keeps bringing basket after basket of bread.  Even though the bread probably doesn't have anything to do with your meal being delayed, after a certain point, you're going to be all like "enough with the fucking bread".

Edit:  And when you have companies like Capcom, whose E3 lineup is 3/4 remasters, it gives the impression that remasters are being financed over new games.