Nintendo Wii U and PS Vita totally deserve what has become of them

[Qwark]

Samus Aran said:

Qwark said:

Since they also develop other and might I say big games than sequels as Horizon and the recently released Bloodborne they are doing a better job than Nintendo that is for sure, not to begin about Quantic Dream, Media Molecule or Sucker Punch, which have yet unknown projects. 

Sony didn't develop Bloodborne, From Software did.

What big games does Sony have this year? Do tell me... All I see is niche stuff. If you think the PS4 is a big success because of those games than you're horribly wrong. 

Japan studios and From software it was a collibration between those two. And yes Bloodborne contributed to Sony's succes as did the fact the PS3 had plenty first party support and many new IP's and a diverse library. It is the very reason the PS1 buried the N64 succes and the PS2 buried the GC under a big pile of horseshit saleswise and being friendly with third party suport did help. Which Nintendo doesn't want to have anyways. It will not even be a question if Sony will have a more diverse first party line-up at the end of this gen, it is what Sony has done for many years.

Sony had bloodborne it didn't need more for the first half year which is just as big as Splatoon if you ask me. For the second half year neither Nintendo or Sony have a big game, but Sony has the luck of having third party support. On top of that MGS 5 could almost be counted as a PS exclusive sales wise.

The reason the PS4 launch was a succes is quite simple it didn't try to amputate all it's limbs before launching like MS with DRM and Nintendo with having a 2d platformer as launch title, having a weird controller and being underpowered with a hefty price tag. It continues to be a succes due to a constant flow of games, even some if some of them are remakes. Microsoft had a terrible launch but due to correcting is errors and getting a stream of games it outsells the Wii U easily.