A_C_E said:
That's the beautiful thing about the English language, context. You don't have to say something directly to put forth what your saying. It bleeds through your posts as you push that all these remasters are nothing but cash grabs and anti-consumerist acts. If I miss-read your context (I'm sure I didn't) then I whole-heartedly apologize, not trying to put words in your mouth just trying to portray what you are saying. I'm not trying to invalidate your opinion, it's an opinion...your perspective of remasters is what I question. I don't know, over a million or two people seem to be ok with paying full price for an upgraded 1 year old game with added DLC put into it. TLoU Remastered has been percieved as a good value for the amount that you pay as have almost all other remasters, no anti-consumerism laws have been broken from TLoU Remastered so I don't think you need to keep going on about something done in complete compliance with the anti-consumerism act as if ND or Sony are profiting off illegal operations. Welp, I'm sorry you aren't able to enjoy what you think are over-priced remasters. |
Then you're reading the context wrong. I don't feel that I need to flag everything I say with "this is my opinion". I feel that it goes without saying that whatever I say is my opinion because who else's opinion could it possibly be?
And if two million people, or 3 million, or a billion people think it's a good value, then that really doesn't make a difference to me. My opinion is not a democracy. The idea of charging more for something that takes less effort is hard to justify. The fact that Sony withheld information from their customers that prevented them from making an informed choice is a blatantly anticonsumer policy. And, I don't think that part is an opinion. Sony prevented their PS3 customers from deciding whether to buy the PS3 version or wait. No way you can claim that's good for consumers.
Speaking of which, I never said any laws were being broken. There are tons of things that people or companies can do within the scope of the law that are still crappy things to do. For instance, we're constantly getting games that are rushed out and broken at launch. Is that illegal? No (although there are some class action lawsuits going on I believe). That doesn't mean it isn't against the best interests of the consumer.