SvennoJ said:
I see what you mean, witcher 3 is not grabbing as much as the souls series or even Skyrim did. After an hour, 2 at most I'm usually done, but I do still come back for more. I could play Dark souls and Skyrim for 10 hours straight without ever losing attention. The problem with witcher 3 is that the good stuff is diluted by a lot of busy work and repetitive filler quests. Last night, 2 hour play time, nothing interesting happened, well I got to lvl 16. The good stuff is worth staying for though, but I wish there was a more obvious distinction between the simple fetch quests (in this case go here, spot the red mark and report or go there and kill x) and the ones that lead to an interesting story. Skyrim handled that better. |
Thats fine. We all have our own taste in games. i can't spent that long on souls but i can on the Witcher 3. lol. Ah , i play it mainly to explore teh ares i haven't seen yet and unlock villages and fill it with people all while travelling with roach :D. Scenery while doing that on pc ultra is gorgeous and it nice when you are travelling , you see a helpless villager who needs your help or a brothel, where geralt can't help but to take a pit stop haha. Even though its a form of afetch quest, each of those type of quests have good amount of sotry and documentrs which you can read and sometimes, some of them , unlock more quests. games liek skyrim or fallout or even borderlands , wher eits jsut collect or kill with no story. thsoe too me ar ethe most boring quests and skyrim has unlimited amount of them lol.