| Miyamotoo said: Every new Zelda is becoming bigger and more complex, so its needed more time, especially if it is first HD, most open and with biggest world in any Zelda game. OoT is considered for best game ever, not just best Zelda, so it's really hard that new Zelda (or every other game) will top OoT and 99 MetaScore. So we have fall of MetaScore from 95>93, evan from 99>93, is that relly big big problem!? Is that really for wake up call!? Because Zelda U looks very promising, it's too early but I can see it like best Zelda game after OoT. Biggest problem with Skyward Sword where motion controls, I liked them, but some people didn't, also game required Motion Plus addon, that had huge impact on sale of game. Like I said, 99 quality game probably will never happen again, all other Zelda scores are around 95 and SS is 93, thats not relly reason for Iwata to cracking heads. :) Also, A Link Between Worlds is better Zelda game than few previous handheld Zelda's. Going from SD to HD and to new hardware was big problem for whole Nintendo, not just Zelda team, not just Zelda team, but they overcome those problems. |
As a fan of Zelda since its inception, SS had issues beyond the motion controls (though that was one problem). Generally speaking, it had make-work missions that extended the game artificially, had a less than excellent art style (the bird designs were more Muppet than epic), and the whole prequel-origin aspect to me was dealt with only moderately well. The world could have really been a primevil undesturbed wilderness, ancient and mysterious, but that only partially well executed. This in contrast to the brilliantly executed OoT story or even the very clever MM theme. SS is even fairly superior in theme and execution to SS. Not a bad game, but for a 5 year development with a supposedly large and talented team, it's a minor let down.
I have high hopes for Zelda U, but the track record of the Anouma Zelda team since Yoshiaki Koizumi (and his creative plot writing and game mechanics) left to lead EAD Tokyo is not promising. Double the time with measurably inferior results.
