By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Jon-Erich said:
Pavolink said:


http://nintendoeverything.com/a-look-at-the-team-sizes-and-development-periods-for-the-zelda-games/

 

As you can see, this proves my point. And in many ways. Skyward Sword development cycle is 5 years, not 3. A Link Between Worlds is 4, not 2. On top of that, this image also proves how the development cycle of past games are shorter than the new ones, which, once again, proves my point.

Don't give me that. I'm not going by team size or man hours. I'm going by when they started and when they finished. It even shows that I was right about the development times. Of course the newer games are going to require bigger teams. The facts still stand. Skyward Sword's development started in 2008 and stopped in 2011. A Link Between Worlds started in 2011 and ended in 2013. Besides, what does any of this do with explaining why Aonuma isn't fit to run the Zelda team?

1. Why does new games will requiere bigger developmente cycles if teams are bigger?

2.And the full cycle of Skyward Sword is 5 years. Even if development was just 3, pre-production was 2 and that counts also.

3. As already explained in many other threads, he doesn't know what to do with the franchise anymore. Zelda HD is based on Zelda NES (open world). This is most likely their own version adding some new features from previous games and some new ones like Hyrule Warriors. This game is not a new concept, like other games, from example The Wind Waker or Majora's Mask.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile