Currently Online 
| PwerlvlAmy said: Bethesda games ;D -hides- |
No reason to hide, this is more or less true. Same with Ubisoft and DICE.
My definition would be either a game that was little content, poor overall quality, severe lack of polish, major and/or game breaking bugs or are delivered missing one or several features we were promised for some time.
Examples of unfinished games, by my own definition; Gran Turismo 5 (the vast majority of cars were re-skinned PS2 models and only a handful of vehicles sported interiors, online was paltry at the beginning).
Assassin's Creed: Unity; the bugs were huge and game breaking and the title had a great lack of polish.
Battlefield 3; server issues galore and for over 6 months, and even after you could connect, there were major issues with lag, bungee lapses, clipping and bugged balistics.
Fallout 3; yes, it's open world, yes you can go everywhere you want. But why would you want to? If you've seen two-three sites, you've seen them all, it has a crippling lack of variation that reviewers somehow missed or ignored and even though the gameplay is solid, it kind of defeated the purpose of an open world with its lack of variety and flair.
GTA V; or GTA Online to be specific, this one should be self-explanatory...
Evolve; ridiculously small amount of content.
Dragon Age 2; not only unfinished, but also piss poor overall, it should never have been released and showed everyone how low Bioware are willing to stoop to please EA.
