| Ka-pi96 said: On the disc DLC is absolutely disgusting. You're paying for the disc and everything on it should be included for that price. Off the disc DLC depends on how it is done. If it's day 1, then it's terrible. If it's for something that should have been in the game in the first place, terrible. Stupidly expensive, terrible. However if it is a decent amount of content, the price is reasonable and it is clearly something that was made in addition to the original game (and NOT as a part of the game that was ripped out to be sold separately) then it's a brilliant idea, more please  |
It would be the same content rather it's on the disc, or your disk. I'd rather have it on the disc and not wasting space. It's not like it's tangible anyway. It's digital. When you buy the game disc, you have certain rights to the content on that disc. You do not own anything on the disc. It's just a digital licence. Looking into it any more than what it actually is, only leads to upset, and a need for bigger hard disk drives.
Then again. It doesn't matter when it was done. Day one, or not. Remember, this discussion is about DLC offsetting the prices of high development to keep the base game at a reasonable cost. Not how DLC should, or should not be handled, unless it's related to the main subject.
You can have a different team work on DLC at the same time the game is in development. So, it could still be day one DLC. Or should we get everything with all copies of the game being 80-100 dollars. Even for those who don't want the extra content, or would like to continue paying for cheaper games?
