freebs2 said:
To make clear. Demand pull does mean you design an innovation in order to meet an expresseed (or unexpressed) customer need, the innovation is driven by watching the market. Tecnological push does mean you design a tecnological innovation, and then you try later to convince the market your innovation is usefull (create a new need). Well you've actually nailed one part of the problem here. 3DS is killing off WiiU sales, beacuse right now the only reason to own a Nintendo console is to play Nintendo games and 3DS right now is a much more convient way to access those games for the average joe. If ever, this further proves a part of the market wants Nintendo games but there's no need for a Ps4tendo. |
Yes, if a Ps4tendo was created for the sole purpose of playing nintendo games, I would agree with you. But according to the post, the ps4tendo would have all major 3rd party support. Therefore games that cannot exist on the 3ds (the witcher 3, skyrim, destiny, Batman, borderlands, GTA, far cry, ...) suddenly can be played on a console that can also play big AAA Nintendo games (metroid prime, legend of zelda, pikmin, ...). This is the demand pull I am referring to. The wii u cannot due this because it is literally a pain to develop for (no x86 architecture, last gen cpu, mediocre gpu, ...) compared to the competition, meaning weak 3rd party support, meaning a lack of games. The wii u isn't failing because it has no good games (bayonetta 2, smash, and mario kart counter this), it is failing because it is missing the other great 3rd party games. But this can all be reasonably rectified next gen while also having reasonably impressive specs.







