mjk45 said:
PwerlvlAmy said:
RolStoppable said:
PwerlvlAmy said:
You have no competition, you have no room for improvement and you become complacennt when one person holds the monopoly. Less options. Competition will always be good imo
|
Plenty of companies have become complacent in the video game business despite never holding a monopoly, so the existence of competition really hasn't helped.
Besides, video games are entertainment, so even a monopoly couldn't act as it pleases. If the offered product is deemed no good or too expensive by the market at large, then even a monopoly would have to bow to the power of disinterest in order to survive.
|
Existing of competition has helped and I will continue believing this because without competition, you wouldnt have some of the titles you see today in the gaming industry. Competition fueled creativity in the gaming industry and made it what it was today. You're free to disagree with that and I 100% respect it, but that's how I personally feel about it
|
I have to agree with Rol here ,in regards to Nintendo, it's not like where talking about a monopolistic power utility or equivelant, where opting out is not a viable alternative , having more than one player in a sector doesn't always lead to more competion especially if they or the public sees enough differentiation between them , also the word duopoly wasn't coined for no reason .
I like you believe that it is usually better for the consumer to have choice but the choice has to be a competive one.
|
No prob. Agree to disagree :)
