| ils411 said: wait.waitwait wait wait..wIt WIAT, so, this got lower scores due to "lack of content" and the defence for the lqck of content is that stuff are coming soon and points shouldnt be deducted for lack of content? what a load of bull crap! scorew should reflect what it is NOW and whT it will be inx number of months or in the future. mich like how drive club is better now due to a shyet load of patches. scores should reflect its crapines when it released and not consider the patches. its the devs/publishers fault for releasing a half baked game and scores should reflect what is there day one not some future promise crap. lack of content? minus points. glitchy? minus points....bububububuuut we gonna fix it aoon with morw content and patchez.. screw u! reciews must reflect the NOW and not then THEN. honestly this is he most stupid lame ass bull crap excuess ive heard ever! |
Lack of content, but it will be coming soon, is quite a worry coming out of a Nintendo 1st party studio. I do hope Nintendo isn't getting into the nickel and diming game because that really would mean doom for the gaming industry with basically no AAA producers guilty of shortchanging gamers in this way. Here's hoping the future DLC that is necessary to round out the content of the game will all be free. Has Nintendo officially spoken on whether the upcoming DLC will have an extra cost?
I agree that the game should be reviewed based on content at release. About the only exception is day 1 free DLC / patch.
“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Jimi Hendrix
