By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
oniyide said:
DonFerrari said:


Point taken. But did it suck enough for a 80% less sale on twice as big userbase? Did everyone knew it sucked before hand since most copies sell early on?


IMHO yeah a bit. right before the series got super big. Wii version was selling on par. COD3 Wii was the 2nd best selling one. But that game SUCKED HARRRD! So the next one sells a little less. As teh other systems got more popular so did the series. It always sold best on MS anyway. PS3 version being damn near the same version albeit DLC coming late etc. caught some of the popularity. I think after the first one the damage was done. Plus its a very multiplayer online centric game, so most people want to play with there friends. Most people werent playing on Wii. 

The irony is the Wii versions were actually getting better quality wise over time but still didnt come close to PS360 version. 

People have no issue buying something that might not be the best version, no one is really trying to own like 3 consoles and a PC but it has to be a little difference. The difference between most PS360 multiplats were minute enough that unless you're one of us you arent going to notice. With Wii anyone half blind could see the difference.

It was second but sold a lot less than x360 version even with the difference in userbase.

 

On the subpar version, we have so much claim that graphics don't matter that I started believing.

 

Have sports franchise sold well on Wii before being chopped?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."