By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
160rmf said:
captain carot said:
tbone51 said:
captain carot said:
Just for that third parties dont need Nintendo and Nintendofans... argument:

It's actually Nintendo that needs third party to get gamers on board that are not so specific Nintendo fans.

Otherwise and the Wii 'accident' taken aside it's 62m>49m>33m>22m>~15m>under 10m>dead.


Why do people always take out Wii! Is it Nintendo's fault it struck gold? Do we not count PSP huge success with vita being 15mil-20mil and the next HH doing 10mil-20mil? :0

"Wii Accident" :-/ And people exclude HHs too which Nintendo strives at!

Handhelds aren't home consoles.

Consoles or not, if we exclude Handhelds we are ignoring nintendo as a whole

For a lot of people that is the importance of Nintendo.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."