Nintendo Fans Vs. Third-Party Developers & Entitlement

[Jizz_Beard_thePirate]

JRPGfan said:

Captain_Yuri said:

DonFerrari said:

Captain_Yuri said:

Thats the thing though, the wiiU had the worst versions in one way or another. Whether it be by performance issues or missing DLC, for majority of the third party games, it was the worst version

And cod on the wii was the worst version... So it makes sense as to why it sold the least

There is no denying that Nintendo fan's buy Nintendo consoles for Nintendo exclusives but I highly doubt that the third party's gimped versions weren't the causes for the bad sales as well...

PS versions were a lot worst than Xbox on begin of last gen... Bayoneta was basically unplayable on launch.. they still sold on par... not 1/20 on basically the same game but worst graphic, that we are supposed to believe it doesn't matter.

Hmm, that is true... Maybe 160rmf is right, Sony fans do/can settle for less

Hense the word choice of entitlement? seems fitting enough.

 

If the resolution is lower, or the fps, maybe it all comes down to hardware of the consol? it is alot weaker than the other two.

Its not realistic to expect to have the "best" version of any 3rd party game on the Wii U.

And it shouldnt stop people from buying a game, if they like what they see gameplay wise.

Huh... I didn't realize not settling for an unplayable game is considered being entitled... I could swear that not buying an unplayable game ment that you were a smart shopper...

Also I was comparing it to the ps3/360 versions and I also said "One way or another" which meant that it would be gimped either by graphics/performance or missing dlc. While graphics and performance wasn't the issue with all of the third party games, missing dlc was the case with majority of the third party games