By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
daredevil.shark said:
Goodnightmoon said:

... Of course, have you read the comment that I was answering? He was telling that Nintendo games are just "another mario" and all that stuff while he was defending Bloodborne.

That is what I was telling that, while bloodborne is a briliant game, anyone could say that is just another soul game, the same happens with mario.

But the thing is, the differences between Mario world - Mario 64 - Mario Galaxy -Mario 3D world are bigger than the differences bettween souls games.


To each his own. I see all mario games same as its predecessors. No difference. While I loved playing mariokart wii; when I picked Wii U version at my friends house I saw no difference (except graphics). Bloodborne plays very differently. Its not souls game expansion.

And another thing is; making good and critically acclaimed games isnt enough in this age. You gotta sell them. And you need to sell systems. Unless you sell them you dont get money. And if you dont get money you wont be making thsoe quality games in "future" anymore.

How can you see the same on Mario Shunshine, Mario Galaxy and Mario 3D world? Really, I can´t understand it. You need to be extremely superficial to think that way or someone that didn´t played any of those games.

Bloodborne plays VERY differetly? lol, is just more quick, is like Demon Souls. Bloodborne is everything but original, it has the same mechanics and the level design is quite similar, the only massive change is the artstyle. The gameplay is Demon Souls with a gun and more faster.

And BTW, Nintendo sell TONS of videogames even with the WiiU failing. They have already 8 milion sellers on the console, including MK8 with 5m sold, Smash with 3.3m  or M3DW at 3m. They are earning money of all those games, just saying.  People don´t want the console, but the people LOVE their games, look how much they sell on 3DS, is crazy.