daredevil.shark said:
Goodnightmoon said:
Bloodborne: 92 on meta
Super Mario 3D World: 93
Smash Bros 4: 92
Bayonetta 2: 91
Is not.
And Bloodborne can also be called "just another Souls game" as its core mechanics are the same as Demon Souls, and is quite similar to Dark Souls 1 and 2 too. Just because it has a different name, it doesn´t make it something new and fresh, it´s the same concept, gameplay and the same developer, the game was popular on the first place for being part of the Souls saga. And viceversa, just because a game is called the same way is not just the same game, Mario 3D world is not just another Mario, it has little to do with Galaxy (the previous one) , and Bayo 2 is the second game of the saga, not just "another Bayonetta"
|
Same can be called super mario / smash bros games. Because they are just another mario game. This is the most hillarious post I have ever read.
|
... Of course, have you read the comment that I was answering? He was telling that Nintendo games are just "another mario" and all that stuff while he was defending Bloodborne.
That is the reason why I was telling that, while bloodborne is a briliant game, anyone could say that is just another souls game, the same happens with mario.
But the thing is, the differences between Mario world - Mario 64 - Mario Galaxy -Mario 3D world are bigger than the differences between souls games. That makes the argument even more invalid.
