Million on 27 April 2008
| Bursche said: What evidence is that? Your only evidence is that TWO companies have gotten sued, with no evidence to state they have been successfully sued or settled. The Dannon one even says that the woman suing didnt win. I can sue everyone in the entire world on anything, but it wouldnt matter unless I win. Nintendo will never be sued for Wii Fit. They will NEVER say "This and only this will make you fit!" They will be like all companies and say that studies have proven for it to help in a healthy lifestyle. |
Like I stated in my post , "As long as nintendo don't advertise Wii-Fit as a viable way to get fit they'll avoid getting their asses kicked in a court of law
Wether they won or not is beside the point , the mere fact that they had some thing to sue for indicates the ilelgality of it . False advertising is illegal in the EU (whether that's different in the US is beyond me). If a product advertises that it does A and it really does B or doesn't even manage to do A (putting it simply) then it is in violation of the law and the company responible for the product would be found liable in the civil courts.
