Skeeuk said:
ToastyJaguar said:
The_God_of_War said:
rasone77 said:
The_God_of_War said:
The biggest game of the decade is better on the PS3 , I think that makes up for it. |
Based on my analysis of the other rounds I really don't think that GTA 4 is going to beat the 360 (at least on the eurogamer comparisson) because: a) They will downplay the framerate issues on the 360, and make no mention of pop-in b) They will talk up achievments c) They will claim the DLC (something no one knows a single detail about) is so massive and that causes the 360 to edge out the PS3. but make no mention of Home integration. Mark my words, I WILL EAT CROW if this isn't the case. |
Yeah, and I bet they mention achievements but completely ignore the motion sensing on the PS3 version. And they will probably completely disregard the PS3 advantages simply because of the mandatory install.
|
What if these are fair comparisons? Everyone knows most early multiplats perform better on the 360 and that the newer games like COD4 and Burnout Paradise are performing better on the PS3. If you read those comparisons and saw the shots then they say the ps3 has the edge. Where is the bias? i'l be going here for all my comparison screenshot needs. I'm very impressed with their techniques. |
well thier comparisons are good, but theier wording is horrible, read the assassins creed comparison, they make out as if the ps3 version is dire, i had creed on ps3 and have played it on 360, i didnt see any of the differences they mentiond, the only thing was ps3 looks brighter which is corrected by setting the rgb to full, they both look the same and play the same. i like the part when they say on ps3 version every movement makes the frame drop lol wht a lie. |
thats ehat im saying. i have played assassins creed on my ps3 before it was stolen and i never noticed any freamerate issues with EVERY move i made lol, and the quality of the images on my tv screen were way better than the images they are showing. biased towards the 360 comes to mind.
