The figures are just calculated from Nintendo's graph, I didn't make the graph.
Here's the data I calculated, if it doesn't match what you think it should check Nintendo's graph, if the data matches the graph blame Nintendo. If the data doesn't match the graph blame me. Remember, these aren't exact, expect them to be slightly off, if there's a significant discrepancy feel free to point it out.
360:
EU:
Week:
01: 50k
02; 43k
03; 24k
04; 23k
05; 24k
06; 22k
07; 19k
08; 19k
09; 22k
10; 19k
11; 32k
12; 49k
13; 48k
14; 43k
15: 32k
Q1: 394k
TT: 469k
DE:
Month:
16: 253k (only 360 month I could cross reference, it matches)
PS3:
Q1: 725K
TT: 860K
UK/FR/DE: 449k
Missing: 276k
EU:
Week:
01: 108k
02; 65K
03; 50K
04; 45K
05; 47K
06; 43K
07; 44K
08; 44K
09; 49K
10; 45K
11; 45K
12; 58K
13; 82K
14; 76K
15: 59K
UK:
Month:
10: --k (859k)
11: 79k (938k)
12: 62k (1000k)
13: 80k (1080k)
Q1: 221k
FR:
Month:
10: --k (522k)
11: 56k (578k)
12: 33k (611k)
13: 45k (656k)
Q1: 134k
DE:
Month:
(I could cross reference most of this, any difference is due to the margin of error in the method used to calculate the data.
Month: MonthK (Graph LTD) [GfK LTD] Difference
01: 49K (049K) [54.4K] -5.4K
02: 26K (065K) [70.5K] -5.5K
03: 11K (076K) [83.5K] -7.5K
04: 10K (086K) [91.5K] -5.5K
05: 11K (097K) [99.5K] -2.5K
06: 23K (119K) [NA]
07: 16K (135k) [135K] +0K
08: 38k (173k) [172K] +1K
09: 44k (217k) [NA]
10: 94k (311k) [309K] +2K
11: 33k (344k) [TBA]
12: 23k (367k) [TBA]
13: 39k (406k) [TBA]
Q1: 94k
Wii:
Q1: 1183k
TT: 1415K
UK/FR/DE: 862k
Missing: 321k
EU:
Week:
01: 36k
02: 58k
03: 109k
04: 88k
05: 92k
06: 92k
07: 95k
08: 109k
09: 103k
10: 100k
11: 89k
12: 109k
13: 103k
14: 111k
15: 121k
DE:
Month:
Whilst much of it matches the GfK data, some of it does not, for example Nintendo have LTD through 2007 at 776k, whereas GfK Media Control said it was 728k. This is not within the margin of error. Wii is clearly 50k higher on the graph than the GfK data, you can see this without even counting pixels. At month 10 Wii should be at 360k according to GfK,the graph has it clearly at 400k. This explains much of the discrepancy. The November & December match GfK data, it's just the LTD at the end of December that doesn't.
Month: MonthK (Graph LTD) [GfK LTD] Difference
01: 119k (119k) [NA]
02; 038k (157k) [NA]
03; 027k (184k) [NA]
04; 017k (203k) [202k] +1k
05; 028k (231k) [222k] +9k
06; 030k (261k) [NA]
07; 022k (283k) [265k] +18k
08; 036k (319k) [291k] +28k
09; 045k (364k) [NA]
10; 036k (400K) [361k] +39k
11; 031k (431K) [389k] +42k
12; 133k (564K) [NA]
13; 212k (776K) [728k] +48k
14; 043k (819K) [TBA]
15: 035k (854K) [TBA]
16: 062k (916K) [TBA]
Q1: 140k
FR:
Month
13: ---k (1272k)
14: 106k (1378k)
15: 072k (1450k)
16: 067k (1517k)
Q1: 245k
UK:
Month:
13: ---k (2086k)
14: 141k (2227k)
15: 171k (2398k)
16: 165k (2563k)
Q1: 477k
