fps_d0minat0r said:
Yeah that makes sense.... to spend more time optimising the game for the market that they are getting the most money from... X1/PS4/Mid-range PC's. What are you complaining about? That they didnt spend the time making the entire game look like the original trailer for the minority of gamers who would have been able to run it like that? why would they do that? Their jobs and future games are not reliant on the approval of the minority. |
When did downgrading = optimising?
Optimising would be to give PC users the actual high end versio they showed last summer and consoles the current version. Also a mid range PC will run this game at an easy 60fps 1080p so what you mean is low end pcs. This is why I complain - the majority of pc owners are getting stuck with low end games for yet another generation and it is due to lazy developers who don't know what option settings are in a game engine. Hell, the new consoles were even made to make porting to PCs easy and allow for option boosts. There is no excuse nowadays for a bad pc port.
There is a myth out there that anything that looks great must run on some multi $1000 dollar machine. That is simply wrong. A very good gpu only costs about £120 now (a gpu at least x2 more powerful tahn the ps4), and a very high end gpu costs £220. So in short, a cheap pc will run rings around any game at 1080p and has done so for years.







