sundin13 said:
I wouldn't say that they are really doing harm, just that the AAA market is harming itself by trying to chase this market. Perhaps you could say that they are doing harm by allowing certain franchises (mostly sports related) to be annualized by continually purchasing them regardless of quality. They allow these games to be profitable without much work, which discourages the companies from actually taking the time to make a good game (why put in effort to make a good game when you can just slap a new number on a box and make money off of it). Overall, I'd say the effect that the "Representation Pressure Groups" and the "Dude Bros" have are both fairly minimal, and while they are good things to be generally aware of (for when you see an example of pandering that is over the top), they don't actually matter that much at the end of the day (imo). |
See, where they're not having the same impact is that this group doesn't demand certain ratios or have things removed from games. They just buy what interests them, which is how the market should work. If they aren't interested in something, they don't go campaigning to have it removed, censored, etc.
You can claim that developers are shoehorned into making games for this audience because it's profitable, but that's a very different argument than changing a game's content as to not offend or meet some arbitrary quota.







