Wright said:
As for the campaign, I don't trust whatever people have to say on the matter until I have something tangible to analize. For all we know, it could be a hype-riding machine, or some bought previews to speak positively on the matter. Look at Destiny. Alternatively, people could say bad things about it only for it to turn out awesome. Look at Resident Evil 6. Your comparison to Mario Galaxy isn't a good one considering Mario Galaxy was decent at best, so you reinforce my theory about the campaign. There's lack of content, to put it bluntly. Free updates don't void the fact that the game releases pretty much barebones. New Vegas is an awesome game that eventually fixed all of its problems, added tons and tons of awesome content and gave a run for everyone's money. Doesn't excuse the fact that back when it first released it was a complete mess, almost unplayable at times. Reviews reflect on this later thing, and they don't have to change just because they fixed it later. Some community will drive towards Splatoon, but after a while, they'll come back to Mario Kart and Smash and leave Splatoon forever. It doesn't hurt the quality of the game per se, but its life on the long run. |
That's purely subjective and not even a fault of the game. I've played such games for hours non-stop having loads of fun the whole way.
Super Mario Galaxy has 97 on Metacritic lol. Those people you don't trust are the one who determine the score.
Already explained this before, everyone considering buying the game is gonna take the update content into account, so reviewers have to aswell if they want their review to matter past the first couple days.
You have a Crystal ball now? And I don't what would keep one from playing Mario Kart/Smash n Splatoon at the same time like how pretty much everyone already does that.