| eva01beserk said: I get where your coming from, but the main diference here from Call of duty, destiny, battlefield and so on, is that nintendo is telling us what the content is, when is coming, why is happening AND the best thing is, its all FREE. WHere you to tel me that all that added content would have been payed dlc, then the world deserves to burn nintendo down and hold hands, when you compare it to destiny where the $15(I think) expansion was like 10 mins of content that can be replayed over and over and we had no idea what it was untill release, nintendo is doing it way better.
Edit: Also forgot to mention, nobody knows how long and good the single player story is. Coming from nintendo, it could have great replay value and be decent lenth even if the focus they are selling it with is mutyplayer. |
If Splatoon was being advertized as a singleplayer game with tacked on multiplayer, maybe I'd see where you're coming from, but it isn't. It's being advertized as a game you play for the multiplayer. I'll say it as many times as I have to - Splatoon should have been free to play. The single player should have been $20-$25 and the whole thing should have been advertized as a platform with real, priced, DLC. The base game isn't worth $60, and that's the biggest issue. No one would complain about one online mode and only five maps at launch if they were free to play. Killer Instinct had it right.
